|


To see the PowerPoint
presentation about the Conference,
click here
|
About
Thiruvalluvar
Since
no historical evidences exist that describe Thiruvalluvar’s personal life,
historians can only theorize about the life of person Thiruvalluvar. The
historians agree that Thiruvalluvar should have been a happily married man
and perhaps had children of his own. He must have been a virtuous man.
Also, judging from his depth of knowledge about kingship, politics and
governance as evidenced from the second part of the book, Thiruvalluvar
should have held a fairly high position in a king’s court. Also, there are
ample evidences to suggest that he must have been a revolutionary thinker
advocating rationalism and not subscribing to any religion. The three
primary religions of his times were Buddhism, Brahmanism (later became
known as Hinduism) and Jainism. He seems to have embraced the common
philosophical core elements of the three major religions while ignoring
their ritualistic traditions. It is still a matter of speculation among
historians as to what religion did he actually belong. Many past and
present religious leaders of Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism claim that
Thiruvalluvar must have belonged only to their religion. The more we study
Thirukkural, the more we admire the extraordinary vision and genius of
Thiruvalluvar. Dr. G. U. Pope, who translated Thirukkural into English
states that Thiruvalluvar is indeed “the universal bard” who belongs to
the world and shall remain immortal just like his monumental literary
creation.
E-mail :support@thirukkural2005.org
|